Ambyr Childers seeks restraining order against ex-husband Randall Emmett Childers
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
COURT NO. 8400803859
MARJORIE C. CATE,
Plaintiff,
Vs.
RANDALL E. CHILDRES,
Defendant.
Submitted: August 24, 2019
Decided: January 3, 2020
Nancy A. Lasker, Esquire, Esquire, and Ryan C. Cunliffe, Esquire, of Ater Wynne &
Pilato, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; John M. Breslau, Esquire, and John J. Lopiano, III,
Esquire, of Lopiano & Breslau, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; and Susan P. Sheppard,
Esquire, of Sheppard & Ward, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Robert J. Sherover, Esquire, and Robert W. Herrmann, Jr., Esquire, of McGehee
Tolley McGehee Styer & Herrmann, Dover, Delaware; Scott A. Davis, Esquire, of
Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Delaware; and Edward F. Graziadei,
Esquire, of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for
Defendant.
WITHAM, J. I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Plaintiff Marjorie Cate’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (D.I. 1). In the complaint, Plaintiff Cate alleges that she and
Defendant Randall Childers have “a longstanding, intimate, loving, and consensual
relationship” that was terminated after he moved. Compl. ¶ 7. In the motion, Cate alleges
that she has been unable to see Childers since November 2019,