Marjorie Cate v. Childers

Ambyr Childers seeks restraining order against ex-husband Randall Emmett Childers IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COURT NO. 8400803859 MARJORIE C. CATE, Plaintiff, Vs. RANDALL E. CHILDRES, Defendant. Submitted: August 24,…

Marjorie Cate v. Childers

Ambyr Childers seeks restraining order against ex-husband Randall Emmett Childers

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

COURT NO. 8400803859

MARJORIE C. CATE,

Plaintiff,

Vs.

RANDALL E. CHILDRES,

Defendant.

Submitted: August 24, 2019

Decided: January 3, 2020

Nancy A. Lasker, Esquire, Esquire, and Ryan C. Cunliffe, Esquire, of Ater Wynne &

Pilato, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; John M. Breslau, Esquire, and John J. Lopiano, III,

Esquire, of Lopiano & Breslau, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; and Susan P. Sheppard,

Esquire, of Sheppard & Ward, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Robert J. Sherover, Esquire, and Robert W. Herrmann, Jr., Esquire, of McGehee

Tolley McGehee Styer & Herrmann, Dover, Delaware; Scott A. Davis, Esquire, of

Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Delaware; and Edward F. Graziadei,

Esquire, of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for

Defendant.

WITHAM, J. I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiff Marjorie Cate’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (D.I. 1). In the complaint, Plaintiff Cate alleges that she and

Defendant Randall Childers have “a longstanding, intimate, loving, and consensual

relationship” that was terminated after he moved. Compl. ¶ 7. In the motion, Cate alleges

that she has been unable to see Childers since November 2019,

Leave a Comment